嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
卆卆弌傍 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

the argonautica(唖櫛瑚)-及1何蛍

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




                         The Argonautica 



The Argonautica 



                Apollonius Rhodius 

                     ��fl。 3rd Century B。C。�� 



                                    1 


´ Page 2´

                                       The Argonautica 



                          INTRODUCTION 



     Much has been written about the chronology of Alexandrian literature 

and   the   famous   Library�察  �founded   by  Ptolemy   Soter�察  �but   the   dates   of   the 

chief    writers    are  still  matters   of   conjecture。    The    birth   of  Apollonius 

Rhodius is placed by scholars at various times between 296 and 260 B。C。�察�

while   the   year   of   his   death   is   equally  uncertain。  In   fact�察  �we   have   very 

little information on the subject。           There are two ;lives; of Apollonius in 

the Scholia�察�both derived from an earlier one which is lost。 From these we 

learn that he was of Alexandria by birth�察。�1�� that he lived in the time of the 

Ptolemies�察  �and   was   a   pupil   of   Callimachus�察  �that   while   still   a   youth   he 

composed and recited in public his ;Argonautica;�察�and that the poem was 

condemned�察�in consequence of which he retired to Rhodes�察�that there he 

revised his poem�察�recited it with great applause�察�and hence called himself a 

Rhodian。       The     second     ;life;   adds�此    �Some     say   that   he   returned    to 

Alexandria and again recited his poem with the utmost success�察�so that he 

was   honoured   with   the   libraries   of   the   Museum   and   was   buried         with 

Callimachus。;         The   last   sentence   may   be   interpreted   by   the   notice   of 

Suidas�察     �who     informs     us   that   Apollonius      was     a   contemporary       of 

Eratosthenes�察�Euphorion and Timarchus�察�in the time of Ptolemy Euergetes�察�

and   that   he   succeeded   Eratosthenes   in   the   headship   of   the   Alexandrian 

Library。     Suidas also informs us elsewhere that Aristophanes at the age of 

sixty´two   succeeded   Apollonius   in   this   office。        Many   modern   scholars 

deny   the   ;bibliothecariate;   of Apollonius   for   chronological   reasons�察  �and 

there is considerable difficulty about it。           The date of Callimachus' ;Hymn 

to Apollo;�察�which closes with some lines ��105´113�� that are admittedly an 

allusion to Apollonius�察 �may  be put   with   much   probability at   248   or 247 

B。C。   Apollonius   must   at   that   date   have   been   at   least   twenty   years   old。 

Eratosthenes   died   196´193   B。C。         This   would   make Apollonius   seventy´ 

two     to  seventy´five      when    he   succeeded      Eratosthenes。       This     is  not 

impossible�察�it is true�察�but it is difficult。        But the difficulty is taken away if 

we assume with Ritschl that Eratosthenes resigned his office some years 

before his death�察�which allows us to put the birth of Apollonius at about 

280�察  �and   would   solve   other   difficulties。     For   instance�察  �if   the   Librarians 



                                              2 


´ Page 3´

                                      The Argonautica 



were     buried   within    the  precincts�察   �it  would    account    for  the   burial   of 

Apollonius next to CallimachusEratosthenes being still alive。                  However 

that   may   be�察  �it   is   rather   arbitrary   to   take   away   the   ;bibliothecariate;   of 

Apollonius�察      �which     is   clearly   asserted     by   Suidas�察    �on    account     of 

chronological calculations which are themselves uncertain。                   Moreover�察�it 

is more probable that the words following ;some say; in the second ;life; 

are a remnant of the original life than a conjectural addition�察�because the 

first   ;life;   is   evidently   incomplete�察  �nothing   being   said   about   the   end   of 

Apollonius' career。 

     The principal event in his life�察�so far as we know�察�was the quarrel with 

his   master    Callimachus�察     �which     was   most    probably     the   cause   of   his 

condemnation at Alexandria and departure to Rhodes。 This quarrel appears 

to have arisen from differences of literary aims and taste�察�but�察�as literary 

differences often do�察�degenerated into the bitterest personal strife。                There 

are references to the quarrel in the writings of both。              Callimachus attacks 

Apollonius   in   the   passage   at   the   end   of   the   ;Hymn   to Apollo;�察  �already 

mentioned�察�also probably in some epigrams�察�but most of all in his ;Ibis;�察�

of which we have an imitation�察�or perhaps nearly a translation�察�in Ovid's 

poem of the same name。            On the part of Apollonius there is a passage in 

the third book of the ;Argonautica; ��11。 927´947�� which is of a polemical 

nature    and    stands   out   from    the  context�察   �and   the  well´known       savage 

epigram      upon     Callimachus。      ��2��     Various     combinations       have     been 

attempted by scholars�察�notably by Couat�察�in his ;Poesie Alexandrine;�察�to 

give a connected account of the quarrel�察�but we have not data sufficient to 

determine the order of the attacks�察�and replies�察�and counter´attacks。                   The 

;Ibis; has been thought to mark the termination of the feud on the curious 

ground that it was impossible for abuse to go further。               It was an age when 

literary men were more inclined to comment on writings of the past than 

to produce original work。         Literature was engaged in taking stock of itself。 

Homer was�察�of course�察�professedly admired by all�察�but more admired than 

imitated。     Epic poetry was out of fashion and we find many epigrams of 

this periodsome by Callimachusdirected against the ;cyclic; poets�察�by 

whom      were    meant    at  that   time   those   who    were    always    dragging     in 

conventional       and   commonplace        epithets   and   phrases    peculiar    to  epic 



                                              3 


´ Page 4´

                                        The Argonautica 



poetry。     Callimachus was in accordance with the spirit of the age when he 

proclaimed   ;a   great   book;   to   be   ;a   great   evil;�察  �and   sought   to   confine 

poetical   activity   within   the   narrowest   limits   both   of   subject   and   space。 

Theocritus   agreed   with   him�察  �both   in   principle   and   practice。       The   chief 

characteristics      of   Alexandrianism        are   well   summarized        by   Professor 

Robinson   Ellis   as   follows�此   �Precision   in   form   and   metre�察  �refinement   in 

diction�察   �a   learning    often   degenerating      into   pedantry     and   obscurity�察    �a 

resolute   avoidance   of   everything   commonplace   in   subject�察  �sentiment   or 

allusion。;      These      traits  are   more    prominent      in  Callimachus       than   in 

Apollonius�察�but they are certainly to be seen in the latter。                   He seems to 

have written the ;Argonautica; out of bravado�察�to show that he could write 

an epic poem。        But the influence of the age was too strong。                 Instead of 

the unity of an Epic we have merely a series of episodes�察�and it is the great 

beauty     and    power    of   one   of  these    episodes    that   gives   the   poem     its 

permanent       valuethe     episode    of   the  love   of   Jason    and   Medea。     This 

occupies the greater part of the third book。                The first and second books 

are taken   up   with the  history  of   the voyage  to   Colchis�察 �while  the  fourth 

book   describes   the   return   voyage。       These   portions   constitute   a   metrical 

guide book�察�filled no doubt with many pleasing episodes�察�such as the rape 

of Hylas�察�the boxing match between Pollux and Amyeus�察�the account of 

Cyzicus�察�the account of the Amazons�察�the legend of Talos�察�but there is no 

unity running through the poem beyond that of the voyage itself。 

     The   Tale   of   the   Argonauts   had   been   told   often   before   in   verse   and 

prose�察�and many authors' names are given in the Scholia to Apollonius�察�but 

their works have perished。           The best known earlier account that we have 

is   that   in   Pindar's   fourth   Pythian   ode�察  �from   which Apollonius   has   taken 

many details。       The subject was one for an epic poem�察�for its unity might 

have been found in the working out of the expiation due for the crime of 

Athamas�察�but this motive is barely mentioned by our author。 

     As we have it�察�the motive of the voyage is the command of Pelias to 

bring back the golden fleece�察�and this command is based on Pelias' desire 

to   destroy   Jason�察  �while   the   divine   aid   given   to   Jason   results   from   the 

intention of Hera to punish Pelias for his neglect of the honour due to her。 

The     learning    of  Apollonius      is  not  deep    but  it  is  curio
卦指朕村 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��