嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
卆卆弌傍 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

the dore lectures on mental science(辻親僥讐恙)-及3何蛍

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




     The reader is therefore asked to think them out carefully for himself�察�



                                                  8 


´ Page 9´

                         THE DORE LECTURES ON MENTAL SCIENCE 



and to note their connection with the subject of the next article。 



                                                9 


´ Page 10´

                         THE DORE LECTURES ON MENTAL SCIENCE 



                          INDIVIDUALITY。 



     Individuality      is  the  necessary     complement       of  the  Universal     Spirit�察�

which     was    the   subject   of   our   consideration      last  Sunday。    The    whole 

problem of life consists in finding the true relation of the individual to the 

Universal Originating Spirit�察�and the first step towards ascertaining this is 

to realize what the Universal Spirit must be in itself。 We have already done 

this to some extent�察�and the conclusions we have arrived at are�此�

     That the essence of the Spirit is Life�察�Love�察�and Beauty。 

     That   its   Motive�察  �or   primary   moving   impulse�察  �is   to   express   the   Life�察�

Love and Beauty which it feels itself to be。 

     That the Universal cannot act on the plane of the Particular except by 

becoming the particular�察�that is by expression through the individual。 

     If   these   three   axioms     are   clearly    grasped�察   �we    have   got   a   solid 

foundation from which to start our consideration of the subject for to´day。 

     The first question that naturally presents itself is�察�

     If these things be so�察�why does not every individual express the life�察�

love�察�and beauty of the Universal Spirit�拭�The answer to this question is to 

be    found    in  the   Law    of  Consciousness。       We    cannot    be   conscious     of 

anything except by realizing a certain relation between it and ourselves。 It 

must     affect   us  in   some    way�察  �otherwise     we    are   not  conscious     of   its 

existence�察  �and   according   to   the  way  in   which   it   affects us   we   recognize 

ourselves   as   standing   related   to   it。   It is this   self´recognition on   our   own 

part   carried   out   to   the   sum   total   of   all   our   relations�察  �whether   spiritual�察�

intellectual�察  �or   physical�察  �that   constitutes   our   realization   of   life。   On   this 

principle�察    �then�察  �for   the   REALIZATION           of   its  own    Livingness�察     �the 

production of centres of life�察�through its relation to which this conscious 

realization can be attained�察�becomes a necessity for the Originating Mind。 

Then     it  follows    that  this  realization    can   only   be   complete     where    the 

individual      has   perfect    liberty   to  withhold     it�察 �for   otherwise     no   true 

realization     could    have    taken   place。   For   instance�察   �let  us   consider    the 

working of Love。 Love must be spontaneous�察�or it has no existence at all。 

We     cannot    imagine     such   a   thing   as  mechanically       induced    love。   But 



                                                10 


´ Page 11´

                          THE DORE LECTURES ON MENTAL SCIENCE 



anything which is formed so as to automatically produce an effect without 

any volition of its own�察�is。nothing but a piece of mechanism。 Hence if the 

Originating   Mind   is   to   realize   the   reality   of   Love�察  �it   can   Only   be   by 

relation to some being which has the power to withhold love。 The same 

applies to the realization of all the other modes of livingness�察�so that it is 

only in proportion�察�as the individual life is an independent centre of action�察�

with the option of acting either positively or negatively�察�that any real life 

has   been   produced   at   all。   The   further   the   created   thing   is   from   being   a 

merely mechanical arrangement�察�the higher is the grade of creation。 The 

solar   system   is   a   perfect   work   of   mechanical   creation�察  �but   to   constitute 

centres     which    can   reciprocate     the   highest   nature    of  the   Divine    Mind�察�

requires not a mechanism�察�however perfect�察�but a mental centre which is�察�

in itself�察 �an independent   source of   action。  Hence by  the   requirements of 

the case man should be capable of placing himself either in a positive or a 

negative relation to the Parent Mind�察�from which he originates�察�otherwise 

he would be nothing more than a clockwork figure。 

     In this necessity of the case�察�then�察�we find the reason why the life�察�love�察�

and beauty of the Spirit are not visibly reproduced in every human being。 

They ARE reproduced in the world of nature�察�so far as a mechanical and 

automatic   action   can   represent   them�察  �but   their   perfect   reproduction   can 

only   take   place   on   the   basis   of   a   liberty   akin   to   that   of   the   Originating 

Spirit itself�察�which therefore implies the liberty of negation as well as of 

affirmation。 

     Why�察  �then�察  �does   the   individual   make   a   negative   choice�拭  �Because   he 

does not understand the law of his own individuality�察�and believes it to be 

a law of limitation�察�instead of a Law of Liberty。 He does not expect to find 

the starting point of the Creative Process reproduced within himself�察�and 

so he looks to the mechanical side of things for the basis of his reasoning 

about life。 Consequently his reasoning lands him in the conclusion that life 

is   limited�察  �because   he   has   assumed   limitation   in   his   premises�察  �and   so´ 

logically cannot escape from it in his conclusion。 Then he thinks that this 

is   the   law   and   so   ridicules   the   idea   of   transcending   it。   He   points   to   the 

sequence of cause and effect�察�by which death�察�disease�察�and disaster�察�hold 

their sway  over  the  individual�察�and   says   that sequence is   law。 And   he  is 



                                                 11 


´ Page 12´

                          THE DORE LECTURES ON MENTAL SCIENCE 



perfectly right so far as he goesit is a law�察�but not THE Law。 When we 

have only reached this stage of comprehension�察�we have yet to learn that a 

higher law can include a lower one so completely as entirely to swallow it 

up。 

     The fallacy involved in this negative argument�察�is the assumption that 

the law of limitation is essential in all grades of being。 It is the fallacy of 

the old shipbuilders as to the impossibility of building iron ships。 What is 

required is to get at the PRINCIPLE which is at the back of the Law in its 

affirmative   working�察  �and   specialize   it   under   higher   conditions   than   are 

spontaneously   presented   by   nature�察         �and   this   can   only   be   done   by   the 

introduction       of   the   personal     element�察    �that   is  to   say   an    individual 

intelligence capable of comprehending the principle。 The question�察�then�察�is�察�

what   is   the   principle   by   which   we   came   into   being�拭  �and   this   is   only   a 

personal application of the general question�察�How did anything come into 

being�拭    �Now�察    �as   I  pointed    out   in  the   preceding      article�察 �the   ultimate 

deduction   from   physical   science   is   that   the   originating   movement   takes 

place     in  the   Universal     Mind�察    �and   is  analogous      to  that   of   our   own 

imagination�察�and as we have just seen�察�the perfect ideal can only be that of 

a being capable of reciprocating ALL the qualities of the Originating Mind。 

Consequently man�察�in his inmost nature�察�is the product of the Divine Mind 

imaging      forth   an   image    of   itself  on   the  plane    of  the   relative   as   the 

complementary to its own sphere of the absolute。 

     If we will therefore go to the INMOST principle in ourselves�察�which 

philosophy       and   Scripture    alike   declare    to  be   made     in  the  image     and 

likeness of God�察�instead of to the outer vehicles which it externalizes as 

instruments through which to function on the various planes of being�察�we 

shall   find that   we have reached   a   principle   in  ourselves   which   stands   in 

loco dei towards all our vehicles and also towards our environment。 It is 

above them all�察�and creates them�察�however unaware we may be of the fact�察�

and relatively to them it occupies the place of first cause。 The recognition 

of   this   is   the   discovery   of   our   own   relation   to   the   whole   world   of   the 

relative。   On   the   other   hand   this   must   not   lead   us   into   the   mistake   of 

supposing that there is nothing higher�察�for�察�as we have already seen�察�this 

inmost   principle   or   ego   is   itself   the   effect   of   an   antecedent   cause�察  �for   it 



                                                 12 


´ Page 13´

                         THE DORE LECTURES ON MENTAL SCIENCE 



proceeds from the imaging process 
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��