嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
卆卆弌傍 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

best historical novels and tales(杷追畢鶴櫛蟻煽雰弌傍絞並娼僉).-及2何蛍

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




than     school     textbooks�察    �while�察    �turning    to   a   less   scholarly     quarter�察�

Ainsworth's   ;Preston   Fight�察─  �and   even   his   better´known   ;Guy   Fawkes�察─�

may be cited as illustrating what Mr。 Shorthouse means when he speaks of 

novels ;in which a small amount of fiction has been introduced simply for 

the   purpose   of   relating   History。;      In   all   such   cases   the   average   novel´ 

reader feels that he has been allured on false pretences。                  I am well aware 

that not a few of the books included in my List might be considered to fall 

under the same ban�察�but I think it will be found that in most of them there 

is at least a fair attempt to arouse narrative interest。 

     ing to the List itself�察�it will be noticed that I have been somewhat 

sparing   in   the   books   given   under   the   ;Pre´Christian;   heading。          Novels 

dealing with these very far´off times are apt to be unsatisfactory�察�the mist 

in   which     events   and    personages      are  enveloped�察     �takes   away    from   that 

appearance of reality which is the great charm of the historical novel。                     We 

are   hardly   concerned�察  �in   reading   ;Sarchedon;   and   similar   books�察  �to   get 

away from the purely imaginary pictures which spring from the Novelist's 



                                               6 


´ Page 7´

                         A Guide to the Best Historical Novels and Tales 



own   brain�察  �and   the   danger   is   that   the   very   elements   which   add   to   our 

interest in the tale as such�察�will go far to mislead us in our conception of 

the period dealt with。        There is none of that sense of familiarity which we 

enjoy   when   reading   a   sixteenth   or   seventeenth   century   romance�察  �in   the 

latter case�察�the historical background�察�being easily perceptible�察�merges for 

us with the creations of the author's own imagination。                   Where the writer 

of an ;ancient; romance happens to be a scholar like Ebers�察�we feel that 

so far at least as historical presentment goeswe cannot be far wrong�察�but 

the   bination   of   great   scholarship   and   narrative   capacity   is�察  �alas�察  �too 

rare� �

     I have likewise refrained from giving many tales dealing with Early´ 

Christian      times。    We    are   here�察  �it  must   be   admitted�察    �on   controversial 

ground�察�and under the First Century heading I have endeavoured to insert 

romances       of  the   highest    quality   only。    For    instance�察   �I  think   that  Dr。 

Abbott's   ;Philochristus;   and   Wallace's   ;Ben   Hur;   ought   to   satisfy   two 

different types of readers。         And this is the place�察�doubtless�察�to say that in 

my lists will be found books of widely differing merit and aim。                       School 

teachers�察    �and   others   in   like  capacity�察   �will  easily   discriminate      between 

authors suitable for juvenile or untrained tastes�察�and authors whose appeal 

is   specially   to   those   of   maturer   thought   and   experience。       Differing   as 

much   in   method       and   style   as   in   choice   of   period   and   character   type�察�

Thackeray's ;Vanity Fair; and George Eliot's ;Romola; have at least this 

in monthey require a very high degree of intelligence for their due 

appreciation。       Who�察     �among     those   of   us  with   any    knowledge      of   such 

works�察  �would   dream   of   remending   them   to   a   youthful   reader   fresh 

from   the   perusal   of   Miss   Yonge's   ;Little   Duke�察─  �or   Captain   Marryatt's 

;Children of the New Forest;�拭�

     Naturally in a list of this kind there is bound to be very great inequality�察�

certain periods have been wholly ignored by writers of the first rank�察�while 

in others we have something like an embarras de richesse。                    Consequently�察�

I have been pelled�察�here and there�察�to insert authors of only mediocre 

merit。     In other cases�察�again�察�I have not hesitated to omit works by writers 

of   acknowledged   position   when   these   have   seemed   below   the   author's 

usual standard�察�and where no gap had to be filled。                   I would instance the 



                                               7 


´ Page 8´

                        A Guide to the Best Historical Novels and Tales 



James II。´ William III。 period。           Here Stanley Weyman and ;Edna Lyall; 

might   have   been   represented�察  �but�察  �there   being   no   dearth   of   good   novels 

dealing with both the above reigns�察�I did not deem it advisable to call in 

these     popular    writers    at   the   point   which     has   been    very    generally 

considered   their   lowest。      I   mention   this   to   show   that   omissions   do   not 

necessarily mean ignorance�察�though�察�in covering such an immense ground�察�

I   cannot   doubt   that   romances   worthy   of   a   place   in   my   list   have   been 

overlooked。 

     I think many  will be surprised to find how large a proportion of our 

best writers ��English and American�� have entered the domain of Historical 

or   Semi´Historical   Romance。          Scott�察  �Thackeray�察  �Dickens�察  �George   Eliot�察�

Charlotte Bronte�察�George Meredith�察�R。 L。 Stevenson�察�Hawthorne�察�Peacock�察�

Charles Kingsley�察�Henry Kingsley�察�Charles Reade�察�Anthony Trollope�察�Mrs。 

Gaskell�察�Walter Besant�察�Lytton�察�Disraeli�察�J。 H。 Newman�察�J。 A。 Froude�察�and 

Walter Paterthese are a few of the names which appear in the following 

pages�察    �while   Tolstoy�察   �Dumas�察    �Balzac�察   �George     Sand�察  �Victor    Hugo�察   �De 

Vigny�察  �Prosper   Merimee�察  �Flaubert�察�Theophile   Gautier�察  �Freytag�察  �Scheffel�察�

Hauff�察     �Auerbach�察     �Manzoni�察      �Perez    Galdos�察    �Merejkowski�察       �Topelius�察�

Sienkiewicz�察�and Jokai are�察�perhaps�察�the chief amongst those representing 

Literatures other than our own。 

     ;The   Last   Days   of   Pompeii�察─   �The   Gladiators�察─   �Hypatia�察─   �Harold�察─�

;Ivanhoe�察─   �The   Talisman�察─   �Maid   Marian�察─   �The   Last   of   the   Barons�察─�

;Quentin      Durward�察─      �Romola�察─       �The    Cloister   and    the  Hearth�察─     �The 

Palace   of   the   King�察─   �Westward   Ho� ┌察        �Kenilworth�察─   �The   Chaplet        of 

Pearls�察─     �A    Gentleman       of   France�察─     �John     Inglesant�察─     �The    Three 

Musketeers�察─ �Twenty Years After�察─   �Woodstock�察─ �Peveril of   the  Peak�察─�

;Old   Mortality�察─   ─  �The   Betrothed   Lovers;   �─�I   Promessi   Sposi;���察   �Lorna 

Doone�察─ �The Refugees�察─ �In the Golden Days�察─ �The Courtship of Morice 

Buckler�察─   �Dorothy   Forster�察─   �The   Men   of   the   Moss   Hags�察─   �Esmond�察─�

;The     Virginians�察─     �Heart    of  Midlothian�察─     �Waverley�察─      �The    Master    of 

Ballantrae�察─ �Kidnapped�察─   �Catriona�察─   �The   Chaplain of   the   Fleet�察─   �The 

Seats of the Mighty�察─ �Barnaby Rudge�察─ �A Tale of Two Cities�察─ �War and 

Peace;what visions do these mere titles arouse within many of us�                     �And�察�

though most of the books given in my list cannot be described in the same 



                                              8 


´ Page 9´

                        A Guide to the Best Historical Novels and Tales 



glowing terms as the masterpieces just named�察�yet many ;nests of pleasant 

thoughts; may be formed through their panionship。 

     Hitherto allusion has been mainly in the direction of modern authors�察�

and I would now say a word or two in regard to those of an earlier period 

who     are   also   represented。      Defoe�察     �Fielding�察   �Richardson�察     �Goldsmith�察�

Smollett�察  �Frances   Burney�察  �Samuel   Lover�察  �John   Galt�察  �Maria   Edgeworth�察�

Susan   Ferrier�察  �William   Godwin�察  �Mary   Shelley�察  �Fennimore   Cooper�察  �J。   G。 

Lockhart�察     �Leigh    Hunt�察  �Thos。    Moore�察    �Harriet   Martineau�察    �J。  L。  Motley�察�

Horace Smith�察�Charles Lever�察�Meadows Taylor�察�and Wm。 Carleton��these 

��in greater or less degree�� notable names were bound to have a place�察�and�察�

ing to less distinguished writers�察�I may mention the brothers Banim�察�

Gerald   Griffin�察  �Mrs。   S。   C。   Hall�察  �Lady   Morgan�察  �the   sisters   Porter�察  �W。   G。 

Simms�察  �George   Croly�察  �Albert   Smith�察  �G。   R。   Gleig�察  �W。   H。   Maxwell�察  �Sir 

Arthur     Helps�察   �Eliot   Warburton�察     �Lewis     Wingfield�察    �Thomas      Miller�察  �C。 

Macfarlane�察�Grace Aguilar�察�Anne Manning�察�and Emma Robinson ��author 

of   ;Whitefriars;��。      To   G。   P。   R。   James�察  �Harrison   Ainsworth�察  �and   James 

Grant I have previously alluded。            It has been my endeavour to choose the 

best examples of all the above´named novelistsa task rendered specially 

difficult in some cases by the fact of immense literary output。                  Doubtless 

not a   few  of the   works so chosen   are   open to  criticism�察 �but they  will   at 

least serve to illustrate certain stages in the growth of His
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��