嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
卆卆弌傍 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

descartes¨ reason discourse(却触櫛議容尖)-及8何蛍

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��






                                     PART IV 



     I am in doubt as to the propriety of making my first meditations in the 

place above mentioned matter of discourse�察�for these are so metaphysical�察�

and so unmon�察�as not�察�perhaps�察�to be acceptable to every one。                        And 

yet�察�that it may be determined whether the foundations that I have laid are 

sufficiently   secure�察  �I   find   myself   in   a   measure   constrained   to   advert   to 

them。     I   had   long   before    remarked     that�察 �in  relation   to  practice�察  �it  is 

sometimes       necessary   to    adopt�察  �as  if  above   doubt�察   �opinions    which    we 

discern   to   be   highly   uncertain�察  �as   has   been   already   said�察  �but   as   I   then 

desired to give my attention solely to the search after truth�察�I thought that a 

procedure exactly the opposite was called for�察�and that I ought to reject as 

absolutely false all opinions in regard to which I could suppose the least 

ground for doubt�察�in order to ascertain whether after that there remained 

aught in my belief that was wholly indubitable。                Accordingly�察�seeing that 

our   senses   sometimes   deceive   us�察  �I   was   willing   to   suppose   that   there 

existed nothing really such as they presented to us�察�and because some men 

err in reasoning�察�and fall into paralogisms�察�even on the simplest matters of 

geometry�察�I�察�convinced that I was as open to error as any other�察�rejected as 

false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for demonstrations�察�and finally�察�

when I considered that the very same thoughts ��presentations�� which we 

experience   when   awake   may   also   be   experienced   when   we   are   asleep�察�

while   there   is   at   that   time   not   one   of   them   true�察  �I   supposed   that   all   the 

objects ��presentations��   that had   ever entered into my   mind when   awake�察�

had    in   them    no   more    truth  than    the  illusions    of  my    dreams。     But 

immediately upon this I observed that�察�whilst I thus wished to think that all 

was false�察�it was absolutely necessary that I�察�who thus thought�察�should be 

somewhat�察      �and   as   I  observed    that   this  truth�察 �I  think�察  �therefore   I  am 

��COGITO   ERGO   SUM���察  �was   so   certain   and   of   such   evidence   that   no 

ground   of   doubt�察  �however   extravagant�察  �could   be   alleged   by   the   sceptics 

capable of shaking it�察�I concluded that I might�察�without scruple�察�accept it 

as the first principle of the philosophy of which I was in search 



                                                25 


´ Page 26´

       DISCOURSE ON THE METHOD OF RIGHTLY CONDUCTING THE REASON�察�AND 



                             SEEKING TRUTH IN THE SCIENCES 



     In the next place�察�I attentively examined what I was and as I observed 

that I could suppose that I had no body�察�and that there was no world nor 

any place in which I might be�察�but that I could not therefore suppose that I 

was   not�察  �and   that�察  �on   the   contrary�察  �from   the   very   circumstance   that   I 

thought to doubt of the truth of other things�察�it most clearly and certainly 

followed that I was�察�while�察�on the other hand�察�if I had only ceased to think�察�

although   all   the   other   objects   which   I   had   ever   imagined   had   been   in 

reality   existent�察  �I   would   have   had   no   reason   to   believe   that   I   existed�察  �I 

thence concluded   that   I   was   a   substance   whose   whole   essence or   nature 

consists   only   in   thinking�察  �and   which�察  �that   it   may   exist�察  �has   need   of   no 

place�察�nor is dependent on any material thing�察�so that ; I�察─�that is to say�察�the 

mind by which I am what I am�察�is wholly distinct from the body�察�and is 

even more easily known than the latter�察�and is such�察�that although the latter 

were not�察�it would still continue to be all that it is。 

     After this I inquired in general into what is essential I to the truth and 

certainty of a proposition�察�for since I had discovered one which I knew to 

be true�察�I thought that I must likewise be able to discover the ground of 

this certitude。      And as I observed that in the words I think�察�therefore I am�察�

there is nothing at all which gives me assurance of their truth beyond this�察�

that   I   see   very   clearly   that   in   order   to   think   it   is   necessary   to   exist�察  �I 

concluded that   I   might   take�察  �as   a   general   rule�察  �the   principle�察  �that   all   the 

things     which     we   very    clearly    and   distinctly    conceive      are  true�察  �only 

observing�察�however�察�that there is some difficulty in rightly determining the 

objects which we distinctly conceive。 

     In the next place�察�from reflecting on the circumstance that I doubted�察�

and that consequently my being was not wholly perfect ��for I clearly saw 

that it was a greater perfection to know than to doubt���察�I was led to inquire 

whence I had learned to think of something more perfect than myself�察�and 

I clearly recognized that I must hold this notion from some nature which 

in reality  was   more   perfect。       As   for the   thoughts   of many  other objects 

external to me�察�as of the sky�察�the earth�察�light�察�heat�察�and a thousand more�察�I 

was   less   at   a   loss   to   know   whence   these   came�察  �for   since   I   remarked   in 

them   nothing   which   seemed   to   render   them   superior   to   myself�察  �I   could 

believe that�察�if these were true�察�they were dependencies on my own nature�察�



                                                  26 


´ Page 27´

       DISCOURSE ON THE METHOD OF RIGHTLY CONDUCTING THE REASON�察�AND 



                            SEEKING TRUTH IN THE SCIENCES 



in so far as it possessed a certain perfection�察�and�察�if they were false�察�that I 

held them from nothing�察�that is to say�察�that they were in me because of a 

certain imperfection of my nature。             But this could not be the case with´ 

the   idea   of   a   nature   more   perfect   than   myself�察  �for   to   receive   it   from 

nothing   was   a   thing   manifestly   impossible�察  �and�察  �because   it   is   not   less 

repugnant that the more perfect should be an effect of�察�and dependence on 

the less perfect�察�than that something should proceed from nothing�察�it was 

equally   impossible   that   I   could   hold   it   from   myself�此  �accordingly�察  �it   but 

remained that it had been placed in me by a nature which was in reality 

more   perfect   than   mine�察  �and   which   even   possessed   within   itself   all   the 

perfections of which I could form any idea�察�that is to say�察�in a single word�察�

which was God。          And to this I added that�察�since I knew some perfections 

which I did not possess�察�I was not the only being in existence ��I will here�察�

with   your   permission�察  �freely   use   the   terms   of   the   schools���察  �but�察  �on   the 

contrary�察�that there was of necessity some other more perfect Being upon 

whom I was dependent�察�and from whom I had received all that I possessed�察�

for if I had existed alone�察�and independently of every other being�察�so as to 

have had from  myself all the perfection�察�however little�察�which I actually 

possessed�察�I should have been able�察�for the same reason�察�to have had from 

myself   the   whole   remainder   of   perfection�察  �of   the   want   of   which   I   was 

conscious�察     �and    thus   could    of  myself     have    bee      infinite�察 �eternal�察�

immutable�察�omniscient�察�all´powerful�察�and�察�in fine�察�have possessed all the 

perfections   which   I   could   recognize   in   God。      For   in   order   to   know   the 

nature   of   God   ��whose   existence   has   been   established   by   the   preceding 

reasonings���察�as far as my own nature permitted�察�I had only to consider in 

reference to all the properties of which I found in my                  mind some idea�察�

whether their possession was a mark of perfection�察�and I was assured that 

no one which indicated any imperfection was in him�察�and that none of the 

rest was awanting。         Thus I perceived that doubt�察�inconstancy�察              �sadness�察�

and such like�察�could not be found in God�察�since I myself would have been 

happy   to   be   free   from   them。   Besides�察  �I   had   ideas   of   many   sensible   and 

corporeal things�察�for although I might suppose that I was dreaming�察 �and 

that all which I saw or imagined was false�察�I could not�察�nevertheless�察�deny 

that the ideas were in reality in my thoughts。              But�察�because I had already 



                                                27 


´ Page 28´

       DISCOURSE ON THE METHOD OF RIGHTLY CONDUCTING THE REASON�察�AND 



                             SEEKING TRUTH IN THE SCIENCES 



very clearly recognized in myself that the intelligent nature is distinct from 

the   corporeal�察  �and   as   I   observed   that   all   position   is   an   evidence   of 

depend
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��