嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
卆卆弌傍 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

war of the classes(竣雫況尸)-及11何蛍

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




electrocution   would   be   a   simple�察  �merciful   solution          of   this   problem   of 

elimination�察�but the ruling ethics�察�while permitting the human waste�察�will 

not permit a humane elimination of that waste。 This paradox demonstrates 

the irreconcilability of theoretical ethics and industrial need。 



                                               33 


´ Page 34´

                                      War of the Classes 



     And so the tramp becomes self´eliminating。 And not only self� �Since 

he   is   manifestly   unfit   for   things   as   they   are�察  �and   since   kind   is   prone   to 

beget kind�察�it is necessary that his kind cease with him�察�that his progeny 

shall not be�察�that he play the eunuch's part in this twentieth century after 

Christ。 And he plays it。 He does not breed。 Sterility is his portion�察�as it is 

the portion of the woman on the street。 They might have been mates�察�but 

society has decreed otherwise。 

     And�察�while it is not nice that these men should die�察�it is ordained that 

they  must   die�察  �and   we   should   not   quarrel   with   them  if   they  cumber   our 

highways and kitchen stoops with their perambulating carcasses。 This is a 

form of elimination we not only countenance but compel。 Therefore let us 

be cheerful and honest about it。 Let us be as stringent as we please with 

our police regulations�察�but for goodness' sake let us refrain from telling the 

tramp to go to work。 Not only is it unkind�察�but it is untrue and hypocritical。 

We know there is no work for him。 As the scapegoat to our economic and 

industrial sinning�察�or to the plan of things�察�if you will�察�we should give him 

credit。 Let us be just。 He is so made。 Society made him。 He did not make 

himself。 



                                             34 


´ Page 35´

                                      War of the Classes 



                                   THE SCAB 



     In a competitive society�察�where men struggle with one another for food 

and shelter�察�what is more natural than that generosity�察�when it diminishes 

the food and shelter of men other than he who is generous�察�should be held 

an   accursed   thing�拭  �Wise   old   saws   to   the   contrary�察  �he   who   takes   from   a 

man's purse takes from his existence。 To strike at a man's food and shelter 

is to strike at his life�察�and in a society organized on a tooth´and´nail basis�察�

such an act�察�performed though it may be under the guise of generosity�察�is 

none the less menacing and terrible。 

     It   is   for   this   reason   that   a   laborer   is   so   fiercely   hostile   to   another 

laborer who offers to work for less pay or longer hours。 To hold his place�察�

��which   is   to   live���察  �he   must   offset   this   offer   by   another   equally   liberal�察�

which is equivalent to giving away somewhat from the food and shelter he 

enjoys。 To sell his day's work for 2�察�instead of 2。50�察�means that he�察�his 

wife�察 �and   his   children   will   not have   so   good   a   roof   over their heads�察 �so 

warm clothes on their backs�察�so substantial food in their stomachs。 Meat 

will be bought   less   frequently  and it will   be   tougher   and less nutritious�察�

stout new shoes will go less often on the children's feet�察�and disease and 

death will be more imminent in a cheaper house and neighborhood。 

     Thus the generous laborer�察�giving more of a day's work for less return�察�

��measured   in   terms   of   food   and   shelter���察  �threatens   the   life   of   his   less 

generous brother laborer�察�and at the best�察�if he does not destroy that life�察�he 

diminishes it。 Whereupon the less generous laborer looks upon him as an 

enemy�察�and�察�as men are inclined to do in a tooth´and´nail society�察�he tries 

to kill the man who is trying to kill him。 

     When a striker kills with a brick the man who has taken his place�察�he 

has no sense of wrong´doing。 In the deepest holds of his being�察�though he 

does not reason the impulse�察�he has an ethical sanction。 He feels dimly that 

he   has   justification�察  �just   as   the   home´defending   Boer   felt�察  �though   more 

sharply�察  �with   each   bullet   he   fired   at   the   invading   English。   Behind   every 

brick thrown by a striker  is the selfish will ;to   live; of himself�察�and  the 

slightly altruistic will ;to live; of his family。 The family group came into 



                                              35 


´ Page 36´

                                      War of the Classes 



the world before the State group�察�and society�察�being still on the primitive 

basis of tooth and nail�察�the will ;to live; of the State is not so compelling 

to the striker as is the will ;to live; of his family and himself。 

     In addition to the use of bricks�察�clubs�察�and bullets�察�the selfish laborer 

finds   it   necessary   to   express   his   feelings   in   speech。   Just   as   the   peaceful 

country´dweller calls the sea´rover a ;pirate�察─�and the stout burgher calls 

the man who breaks into his strong´box a ;robber�察─�so the selfish laborer 

applies the opprobrious epithet a ;scab; to the laborer who takes from him 

food and shelter by being more generous in the disposal of his labor power。 

The sentimental connotation of ;scab; is as terrific as that of ;traitor; or 

;Judas�察─�and a sentimental definition would be as deep and varied as the 

human   heart。   It   is   far   easier   to   arrive   at   what   may  be   called   a   technical 

definition�察�worded in commercial terms�察�as�察�for instance�察�that A SCAB IS 

ONE   WHO   GIVES   MORE   VALUE   FOR   THE   SAME   PRICE   THAN 

ANOTHER。 

     The laborer who gives more time or strength or skill for the same wage 

than another�察�or equal time or strength or skill for a less wage�察�is a scab。 

This    generousness      on   his   part  is  hurtful   to  his  fellow´laborers�察     �for  it 

compels them to an equal generousness which is not to their liking�察�and 

which gives them less of food and shelter。 But a word may be said for the 

scab。 Just as his act makes his rivals compulsorily generous�察�so do they�察�by 

fortune of birth and training�察�make compulsory his act of generousness。 He 

does     not  scab   because     he   wants    to  scab。   No   whim     of  the   spirit�察 �no 

burgeoning of the heart�察�leads him to give more of his labor power than 

they for a certain sum。 

     It is because he cannot get work on the same terms as they that he is a 

scab。 There is less work than there are men to do work。 This is patent�察�else 

the   scab   would   not   loom  so   large   on   the   labor´market   horizon。   Because 

they    are   stronger    than   he�察  �or  more    skilled�察  �or   more    energetic�察   �it  is 

impossible   for   him   to   take   their   places   at   the   same   wage。   To   take   their 

places   he   must   give   more   value�察  �must   work   longer   hours   or   receive   a 

smaller wage。 He does so�察�and he cannot help it�察�for his will ;to live; is 

driving him on as well as they are being driven on by their will ;to live;�察�

and    to  live   he  must    win   food   and   shelter�察  �which    he   can   do  only    by 



                                              36 


´ Page 37´

                                       War of the Classes 



receiving permission to work from some man who owns a bit of land or a 

piece   of   machinery。  And   to   receive   permission   from   this   man�察  �he   must 

make the transaction profitable for him。 

     Viewed   in   this   light�察  �the   scab�察  �who   gives   more   labor   power   for   a 

certain price than his fellows�察�is not so generous after all。 He is no more 

generous   with   his   energy   than   the   chattel   slave   and   the   convict   laborer�察�

who�察�by the way�察�are the almost perfect scabs。 They give their labor power 

for  about   the   minimum  possible price。   But�察 �within   limits�察  �they  may   loaf 

and   malinger�察  �and�察  �as   scabs�察  �are   exceeded   by   the   machine�察  �which   never 

loafs and malingers and which is the ideally perfect scab。 

     It is not nice to be a scab。 Not only is it not in good social taste and 

comradeship�察       �but�察  �from    the   standpoint     of  food    and    shelter�察  �it  is  bad 

business      policy。   Nobody      desires    to  scab�察  �to   give   most    for  least。   The 

ambition of every individual is quite the opposite�察�to give least for most�察�

and�察�as a result�察�living in a tooth´and´nail society�察�battle royal is waged by 

the    ambitious     individuals。     But    in  its  most    salient   aspect�察   �that  of   the 

struggle   over   the   division   of   the   joint   product�察  �it   is   no   longer   a   battle 

between individuals�察�but between groups of individuals。 Capital and labor 

apply themselves to raw material�察�make something useful out of it�察�add to 

its value�察�and then proceed to quarrel over the division of the added value。 

Neither cares t
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��2�� 家��2��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��