按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
outline of the figure of the madman。 Both take up a position
at once unanswerable and intolerable。
Of course it is not only of the materialist that all this is true。
The same would apply to the other extreme of speculative logic。
There is a sceptic far more terrible than he who believes that
everything began in matter。 It is possible to meet the sceptic
who believes that everything began in himself。 He doubts not the
existence of angels or devils； but the existence of men and cows。
For him his own friends are a mythology made up by himself。
He created his own father and his own mother。 This horrible
fancy has in it something decidedly attractive to the somewhat
mystical egoism of our day。 That publisher who thought that men
would get on if they believed in themselves； those seekers after
the Superman who are always looking for him in the looking…glass；
those writers who talk about impressing their personalities instead
of creating life for the world； all these people have really only
an inch between them and this awful emptiness。 Then when this
kindly world all round the man has been blackened out like a lie；
when friends fade into ghosts； and the foundations of the world fail；
then when the man； believing in nothing and in no man； is alone
in his own nightmare； then the great individualistic motto shall
be written over him in avenging irony。 The stars will be only dots
in the blackness of his own brain； his mother's face will be only
a sketch from his own insane pencil on the walls of his cell。
But over his cell shall be written； with dreadful truth； 〃He believes
in himself。〃
All that concerns us here； however； is to note that this
panegoistic extreme of thought exhibits the same paradox as the
other extreme of materialism。 It is equally complete in theory
and equally crippling in practice。 For the sake of simplicity；
it is easier to state the notion by saying that a man can believe
that he is always in a dream。 Now； obviously there can be no positive
proof given to him that he is not in a dream； for the simple reason
that no proof can be offered that might not be offered in a dream。
But if the man began to burn down London and say that his housekeeper
would soon call him to breakfast； we should take him and put him
with other logicians in a place which has often been alluded to in
the course of this chapter。 The man who cannot believe his senses；
and the man who cannot believe anything else； are both insane；
but their insanity is proved not by any error in their argument；
but by the manifest mistake of their whole lives。 They have both
locked themselves up in two boxes； painted inside with the sun
and stars； they are both unable to get out； the one into the
health and happiness of heaven； the other even into the health
and happiness of the earth。 Their position is quite reasonable；
nay； in a sense it is infinitely reasonable； just as a threepenny
bit is infinitely circular。 But there is such a thing as a mean
infinity； a base and slavish eternity。 It is amusing to notice
that many of the moderns； whether sceptics or mystics； have taken
as their sign a certain eastern symbol； which is the very symbol
of this ultimate nullity。 When they wish to represent eternity；
they represent it by a serpent with his tail in his mouth。 There is
a startling sarcasm in the image of that very unsatisfactory meal。
The eternity of the material fatalists； the eternity of the
eastern pessimists； the eternity of the supercilious theosophists
and higher scientists of to…day is； indeed； very well presented
by a serpent eating his tail； a degraded animal who destroys even himself。
This chapter is purely practical and is concerned with what
actually is the chief mark and element of insanity； we may say
in summary that it is reason used without root； reason in the void。
The man who begins to think without the proper first principles goes mad；
he begins to think at the wrong end。 And for the rest of these pages
we have to try and discover what is the right end。 But we may ask
in conclusion； if this be what drives men mad； what is it that keeps
them sane？ By the end of this book I hope to give a definite；
some will think a far too definite； answer。 But for the moment it
is possible in the same solely practical manner to give a general
answer touching what in actual human history keeps men sane。
Mysticism keeps men sane。 As long as you have mystery you have health；
when you destroy mystery you create morbidity。 The ordinary man has
always been sane because the ordinary man has always been a mystic。
He has permitted the twilight。 He has always had one foot in earth
and the other in fairyland。 He has always left himself free to doubt
his gods； but （unlike the agnostic of to…day） free also to believe
in them。 He has always cared more for truth than for consistency。
If he saw two truths that seemed to contradict each other；
he would take the two truths and the contradiction along with them。
His spiritual sight is stereoscopic； like his physical sight：
he sees two different pictures at once and yet sees all the better
for that。 Thus he has always believed that there was such a thing
as fate； but such a thing as free will also。 Thus he believed
that children were indeed the kingdom of heaven； but nevertheless
ought to be obedient to the kingdom of earth。 He admired youth
because it was young and age because it was not。 It is exactly
this balance of apparent contradictions that has been the whole
buoyancy of the healthy man。 The whole secret of mysticism is this：
that man can understand everything by the help of what he does
not understand。 The morbid logician seeks to make everything lucid；
and succeeds in making everything mysterious。 The mystic allows
one thing to be mysterious； and everything else becomes lucid。
The determinist makes the theory of causation quite clear；
and then finds that he cannot say 〃if you please〃 to the housemaid。
The Christian permits free will to remain a sacred mystery； but because
of this his relations with the housemaid become of a sparkling and
crystal clearness。 He puts the seed of dogma in a central darkness；
but it branches forth in all directions with abounding natural health。
As we have taken the circle as the symbol of reason and madness；
we may very well take the cross as the symbol at once of mystery and
of health。 Buddhism is centripetal； but Christianity is centrifugal：
it breaks out。 For the circle is perfect and infinite in its nature；
but it is fixed for ever in its size； it can never be larger
or smaller。 But the cross； though it has at its heart a collision
and a contradiction； can extend its four arms for ever without
altering its shape。 Because it has a paradox in its centre it can
grow without changing。 The circle returns upon itself and is bound。
The cross opens its arms to the four winds； it is a signpost for free
travellers。
Symbols alone are of even a cloudy value in speaking of this
deep matter； and another symbol from physical nature will express
sufficiently well the real place of mysticism before mankind。
The one created thing which we cannot look at is the one thing in
the light of which we look at everything。 Like the sun at noonday；
mysticism explains everything else by the blaze of its own
victorious invisibility。 Detached intellectualism is （in the
exact sense of a popular phrase） all moonshine； for it is light
without heat； and it is secondary light； reflected from a dead world。
But the Greeks were right when they made Apollo the god both of
imagination and of sanity； for he was both the patron of poetry
and the patron of healing。 Of necessary dogmas and a special creed
I shall speak later。 But that transcendentalism by which all men
live has primarily much the position of the sun in the sky。
We are conscious of it as of a kind of splendid confusion；
it is something both shining and shapeless； at once a blaze and
a blur。 But the circle of the moon is as clear and unmistakable；
as recurrent and inevitable； as the circle of Euclid on a blackboard。
For the moon is utterly reasonable； and the moon is the mother
of lunatics and has given to them all her name。
III THE SUICIDE OF THOUGHT
The phrases of the street are not only forcible but subtle：
for a figure