嗔秤戻幣�哉膵�云利匈嬉蝕湊蛸賜�塋床四衲���萩晦編報炎嘔囚^泡仟 ̄云利匈�《超噌�殻窟�嵌虜隆輓麈觚翹瀘卉韮�仍仍�。� 烏御危列
卆卆弌傍 卦指云慕朕村 厘議慕尺 厘議慕禰 TXT畠云和墮 序秘慕杏 紗秘慕禰

she stands accused(慢頁瓜御)-及35何蛍

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��




more   of   the   family   died�察  �but   M。   Dupuy   and   his   daughter   suffered   from 

bodily numbness for years afterwards�察�with partial paralysis and recurrent 

pains in the extremities。 

     Helene seems to have made Lorient too hot for herself�察�and had to go 

elsewhere。       Port Louis is her next scene of action。             A kinswoman of her 

master   in   this   town�察  �one   Duperron�察  �happened   to   miss   a   sheet   from   the 

household       stock。    Mlle     Leblanc     charged     Helene     with    the   theft�察 �and 

demanded   the   return   of   the   stolen   article。      It   is   recorded   that   Helene 

refused to give it up�察�and her answer is curious。 

     ``I am going into retreat��'' she declared。              ``God has forgiven me   my 

sins��'' 

     There   was   perhaps   something   prophetic   in   the   declaration。           By   the 

time   Helene   was   brought   to   trial�察  �in   1854�察  �her   sins   up   to   this   point   of 

record     were    covered     by   the   prescription     legale�察  �a   sort  of   statute   of 

limitations   in   French   law   covering   crime。       Between   1833   and   1841   the 



                                                 113 


´ Page 114´

                                 SHE STANDS ACCUSED 



wanderings of Helene Jegado through those quiet Brittany towns had been 

marked by twenty´three deaths�察�six illnesses�察�and numerous thefts。 

     There is surcease to Helene's death´dealing between the years of 1841 

and 1849�察�but on the inquiries made after her arrest a myriad of accusers 

sprang up to tell of thefts during that time。             They were petty thefts�察�but 

towards the end of the period they begin to indicate a change in Helene's 

habits。    She   seems   to   have   taken   to   drink�察  �for   her   thefts   are   mostly   of 

wine and eau de vie。 

     In March 1848 Helene was in Rennes。                 On the 6th of November of 

the following year�察�having been dismissed from several houses for theft�察�

she    became     sole   domestic    servant    to  a  married    couple    called   Rabot。 

Their son�察�Albert�察�who was already ill�察�died in the end of December。                    He 

had eaten a farina porridge cooked by Helene。               In the following February�察�

having     discovered     Helene's    depredations     from    the   wine´cupboard�察     �M。 

Rabot gave her notice。         This was on the 3rd of the month。            ��Helene was 

to   leave   on   the   13th。��  The   next   day   Mme   Rabot   and   Rabot   himself�察�

having taken soup of Helene's making�察�became very ill。                  Rabot's mother´ 

in´law    ate   a  panade    prepared    by   Helene。    She    too   fell  ill。 They     all 

recovered after Helene had departed�察�but Rabot�察�like M。 Dupuy´de´Lome�察�

was partially paralysed for months afterwards。 

     In   Helene's   next   situation�察  �with   people   called   Ozanne�察  �her   way   of 

abstracting liquor again was noticed。            She was chided for stealing eau de 

vie。    Soon after that the Ozannes' little son died suddenly�察�very suddenly。 

The doctor called in thought it was from a croup fever。 

     On the day following the death of the little Ozanne Helene entered the 

service of M。 Roussell�察�proprietor of the Bout´du´Monde hotel in Rennes。 

Some   six   weeks   later   Roussell's   mother   suddenly   became   ill。       She   had 

had   occasion   to   reproach   Helene   for   sullen   ill´manners   or   something   of 

that sort。    She ate some potage which Helene had cooked。                    The illness 

that   ensued   lasted   a   long   time。 Eighteen   months   later   the   old lady  had 

hardly recovered。 

     In the hotel with Helene as fellow´servant there was a woman of thirty�察�

Perrotte   Mace�察  �very   greatly   relied   upon   by   her   masters�察  �with   whom   she 

had been five years。        She was a strongly built woman who carried herself 



                                               114 


´ Page 115´

                                  SHE STANDS ACCUSED 



finely。     Perrotte     openly    agreed     with   the   Veuve     Roussell     regarding 

Helene's behaviour。         This�察�with the confidence reposed in Perrotte by the 

Roussells�察�might have been enough to set Helene against her。                     But there 

was an additional cause for jealousy�此�Jean Andre�察�the hotel ostler�察�but also 

described      as   a  cabinet´maker�察     �though     friendly    enough     with   Helene�察�

showed a marked preference for the younger�察�and comelier�察�Perrotte。                     The 

Veuve   Roussell   fell   ill   in   the   middle   of   June。 In   August   Perrotte   was 

seized by a similar malady�察�and�察�in spite of all her resistance�察�had to take to 

her bed。     Vomiting and purging marked the course of her illness�察�pains in 

the stomach and limbs�察�distension of the abdomen�察�and swelling of the feet。 

With   her   strong   constitution   she   put   up   a   hard   fight   for   her   life�察 �but 

succumbed on the 1st of September�察�1850。                  The doctors called in�察�MM。 

Vincent and Guyot�察�were extremely puzzled by the course of the illness。 

At times the girl would seem to be on the mend�察�then there would come a 

sudden relapse。       After Perrotte's death they pressed for an autopsy�察�but the 

peasant relatives of the girl showed the usual repugnance of their class to 

the   idea。   Helene   was   taken   red´handed   in   the   theft   of   wine�察  �and   was 

dismissed。      Fifteen days later she took service with the Bidards。 

     These are the salient facts of Helene's progression from 1833 to 1851 

as   brought    out   by   the  investigations     made    by   and   for  the  Procureur´ 

General     of   Rennes。     All   possible    channels    were    explored    to  discover 

where     Helene     had   procured    the   arsenic�察  �but  without     success。    Under 

examination by the Juge d'instruction she stoutly denied all knowledge of 

the poison。      ``I don't know anything about arsenicdon't know what it is��'' 

she repeated。      ``No witness can say I ever had any。''            It was believed that 

she had secured a large supply in her early days�察�and had carried it with 

her   through   the   years�察  �but   that   at   the   first   definite   word   of   suspicion 

against   her   had   got   rid   of   it。 During   her   trial   mention   was   made   of 

packets found in a chest she had used while at Locsine�察�the place where 

seven   deaths   had   occurred。       But   it   was   never   clearly   established   that 

these   packets   had   contained   arsenic。      It   was   never   clearly   established�察�

though it could be inferred�察�that Helene ever had arsenic at all。 



     �ァ�II 



                                               115 


´ Page 116´

                                   SHE STANDS ACCUSED 



     The     first  hearings     of   Helene's    case    were    taken    before    the   Juge 

d'instruction in   Rennes�察�and she was   remanded to the assizes   for  Ille´et´ 

Vilaine�察  �which      took   place�察   �apparently�察   �in  the   same    city。   The    charges 

against her were limited to eleven thefts�察�three murders by poisoning�察�and 

three attempts at murder by the like means。                Under the prescription legale 

twenty´three poisonings�察�six attempts at poisoning�察�and a number of thefts�察�

all of which had taken place within the space of ten years�察�had to be left 

out   of   the   indictment。     We   shall   see�察  �however�察  �that�察  �under   the   curious 

rules regarding permissible evidence which prevail in French criminal law�察�

the Assize Court concerned itself quite largely with this prescribed matter。 

     The trial began on the 6th of December�察�1851�察�at a time when France 

was in a political uproaror�察�more justly perhaps�察�was settling down from 

political uproar。       The famous coup d'etat of that year had happened four 

days before。       Maitre Dorange�察�defending Helene�察�asked for a remand to a 

later   session    on   the   ground    that   some    of  his   material    witnesses     were 

unavailable       owing    to   the  political   situation。     An     eminent     doctor�察  �M。 

Baudin�察�had died ``pour maintien des lois。''              There was some argument on 

the matter�察�but the President ruled that all material witnesses were present。 

Scientific experts could be called only to assist the court。 

     The   business   of   this   first   day   was   taken   up   almost   completely   by 

questions   on   the   facts   produced   in   investigation�察  �and   these   mostly   facts 

covered   by   the   prescription。       The   legal   value   of   this   run   of   questions 

would seem  doubtful   in   the Anglo´Saxon idea  of   justice�察�but   it   gives   an 

indication      of  the  shiftiness    in  answer     of  t
卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��0�� 家��0��
隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
梁椣戻幣�� 梁心弌傍議揖扮窟燕得胎��傍竃徭失議心隈才凪万弌誌育断蛍�輌臆惨軼僑〃�燕慕得珊辛參資誼持蛍才将刮襲潜��範寔亟圻幹慕得 瓜寡追葎娼得辛參資誼寄楚署衛、持蛍才将刮襲潜填��